
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act - COGSA
The
bulk of maritime commercial activity involves carriage of goods. The most
important document used in this type of transaction is the bill of lading.
A bill of lading is basically a contract of carriage. Since ocean bills
are negotiable, they control possession of the goods and allow for the
financing of the movement of merchandise and commodities around the world.
The good faith purchaser of a bill of lading, or holder in due course,
is given privileged status. The debt is said to be "merged"
with the instrument, which means that when the instrument is discharged,
so is the underlying debt. It also means that only payment to a holder
of the bill or note (someone in physical possession) will discharge the
debt.
One of the most important issues dealt with by maritime law is the loss
for lost or damaged goods. The basic statute regulating the subject is
the Carriage of Goods by Sea Act of 1936 (also known as Cogsa).
The thrust of Cogsa, which followed the Harter Act of
1893 and the Hague Rules, was to prevent ship owners from contracting
out of the duty to use care to put his vessel in good shape for the voyage,
or the duty to properly care for the goods aboard. If he did however provide
a seaworthy vessel, he would not be liable for those in charge of the
vessel. Cogsa only applies to foreign trade. Its application
is also limited to the period running from the time when the goods are
loaded until they are discharged from the ship. In those areas where Cogsa
does not apply, Harter is still applicable law. Also, pursuant
to Cogsa, every bill of lading incorporates the statute. It is
allowed to contract out of Cogsa's terms but only by increasing the ship owner's
liabilities and not by decreasing them.
Among the duties of a carrier are the exercise of due diligence to 1)
make the vessel seaworthy; 2) properly equip, supply and man the vessel;
3) make the holds, cooling compartments and al other areas where the goods
are to be stored, fit and safe for their reception, preservation and carriage.
Once the due care is given, the law protects the carrier by stating in
Section 4 (1) of Cogsa that:
"Neither the carrier nor the ship shall be liable for loss
or damage arising or resulting from unseaworthiness unless caused by
want of due diligence on the part of the carrier to make the ship seaworthy,
and to secure that the ship is properly manned, equipped, and supplied,
and to make the holds, refrigerating and cool chambers, and all other
parts of the ship in which goods are carried fit and safe for their
reception, carriage and preservation in accordance with the provision
of paragraph (1) of section 3. Whenever loss or damage has resulted
from unseaworthiness, the burden of proving the exercise of due diligence
shall be on the carrier or other persons claiming exemption under this
section."
Section 4(2) of Cogsa lists the causes for which the carrier shall not
be liable. The most important is 4(2)a:
"Act, neglect or default of the master, mariner, pilot, or
the servants of the carrier in the navigation or in the management of
the ship"
Sections 4(2) b through p list other causes of damage which are excepted.
Fire, for example, is excepted unless caused by the actual fault or privity
of the carrier. The perils of the sea are also excepted. A carrier is
also not liable for acts of God or, as stated in the statute,
" for any accident as to which he can show that it is due
to natural causes, directly and exclusively, without human intervention,
and that it could not have been prevented by any amount of foresight
and pains and care reasonably to be expected of him."
Other exceptions related to human force include: acts of war; acts of
public enemies; arrest or restraint of princes; seizure under legal process;
quarantine restrictions; riots and civil commotions; strikes; lockouts
or stoppages of work; acts or omissions of the owner or shipper of the
goods; losses arising from inherent defect of the goods or insufficiency
of packing. Section 4(2) provides a catchall exception as follows:
"Neither the carrier nor the ship shall be responsible for
loss or damage arising or resulting from....... any other cause arising
without the actual fault and privity of the carrier and without the
fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier, but the burden
of proof shall be on the person claiming the benefit of this exception
to show that neither the actual fault or privity of the carrier nor
the fault or neglect of the agents or servants of the carrier contributed
to the loss or damage."
The effect of deviation is addressed by Cogsa in Section 4(4) to the
effect that a deviation does not breach the Act or the carriage
contract if it is undertaken to save life or property at sea. a deviation
undertaken to load or unload cargo or passengers is not deemed reasonable
and is therefore in breach.
Suits based on cargo loss or damage or other breach of the contract of
carriage, are within the admiralty jurisdiction. Actions in personam
may be brought either in federal court under the admiralty jurisdiction
or in state courts under the saving clause. It should be noted, however,
that maritime liens arising out of the shipper-carrier relation may be
enforced only in federal court under admiralty jurisdiction.
Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (COGSA): 46 U.S.C. Sec. 1300-1315